3340 days ago
Aiden Earley has obtained an interim injunction against me publishing certain documents he admits are genuine because I might damage his good reputation. Who on earth is he kidding? There are large number of reasons why this man is a Pariah in the City, a scumbag, almost universally despised. And so here we go on explaining to Worthington (WRN) shareholders the track record of your dominant shareholder and the man who has created the omnishambles of a fraud that is your company.
We will gloss over the fact that Earley spent four months in prison for accounting malpractice in 1992. That was a minor career setback. We can go through the numerous failed companies on his CV. Again only a minor setback. We can gloss over his involvement with Craig Whyte and Rangers FC (coming to a Court in Scotland soon) and incidentally a matter where Earley has been quizzed under caution many times.
Perhaps I shall – for the time being gloss over how he subscribed for £80,000 of shares in an AIM placing, took the shares and dumped them but never paid for them. The CEO of the company involved has just donated £1,000 to our “Fighting Aiden Earley of the fraud Worthington (and Rangers FC) Fund" – as I hope that you will do here – and will appear in Court of needs be to explain why behaviour such as this means that Earley’s City reputation is of being a total rotter.
Pro tem we shall gloss over how the emails Earley do not want you to see show once again that he treats a PLC bank account as his own piggy bank and cares not a jot about any standards of decency and adhering to the law.
Let us for now just consider the behaviour which lead to him being disqualified as a director for five years in 2013.
3342 days ago
You would have thought that with all his court experience (you know the jail term for accounting fraud, being disqualified as a director, etc), Worthington (WRN) shadow director Aiden Earley would be able to serve an injunction properly. Oh no…
Worthington boasted on its website that an injunction had been served on me and indeed it was as you can see here. But Earley’s clown of a lawyer appears to have screwed up and it appears that I may not have actually been served after all. An extract from a letter from my lawyers to Earley (and to Worthington) follows.
